From the Editors Peer Review in the Organizational and Management Sciences: Prevalence and Effects of Reviewer Hostility, Bias, and Dissensus
نویسنده
چکیده
Peer review is used in most scientific disciplines to assess the value of new knowledge presented in journal submissions. Individuals well versed in the appropriate research domain evaluate the quality of ideas, empirical rigor, and overall contribution conveyed by a manuscript. In essence, they serve a gate-keeping role by helping to filter out low-quality work (Crane, 1967; de Grazia, 1963). By so doing, they help to protect the integrity of the scientific enterprise and the status of established scholars, whose own claims to preeminence would be undermined by the publication of inferior work, particularly if that work were published in highquality outlets (Cummings, Frost, & Vakil, 1985).
منابع مشابه
Assessment of the Possibility of Vertical Transmission of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol
Background: The novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has put a great burden on global health and healthcare systems. There is controversy regarding the possibility of vertical transmission of COVID-19. The proposed systematic review aims to assess the possibility of vertical transmission of COVID-19 based on currently published literature. Methods: This study will be conducted on all pu...
متن کاملEvaluating the effectiveness of peer-based intervention in managing type I diabetes mellitus among children and adolescents: A systematic review
Background: Type 1 diabetes is one of the chronic metabolic disorders among children and adolescents. Peers are also important units in diabetes management through adolescence. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of peer-based intervention in managing type 1 diabetes mellitus among children and adolescents. Methods: Searching articles published prior to December 2013 in Pub...
متن کاملبررسی دیدگاههای سردبیران مجلات علوم پزشکی ایران در مورد استانداردهای انتشار تحقیقات پزشکی
Background: Medical journal editors have impressible role in the publishing process. In the present study we have surveyed the attitudes and knowledge of Iranian medical journal editors towards standards of published medical research. Materials and methods: 51 editors of registered journals were invited, where 27 have taken part. A self-directed questionnaire according to the Vancouver group g...
متن کاملFactors Involved in Missed Nursing Care: A Systematic Review
Background. Missed Nursing Care (MNC) is experienced in nearly all health care facilities. Awareness of the aspects involved in the occurrence of MNC can lead to the improvement of the quality of patient care. This systematic review aims to answer the question: "What factors are involved in the incidence of missed nursing care?" Methods. This systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting...
متن کاملLow birth weight in Iran: Implications from a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis in the period 1999-2017
Background: Low birth weight (LBW), a crucial determinant of neonatal complications, represents a major public health concern worldwide. Epidemiological research is of crucial importance for designing and implementing ad hoc interventions for this issue, helping and guiding decision- and policy-makers in each country to prevent the increased prevalence of LBW in infants through estimating the p...
متن کامل